Skip to content

Most AI work dies in the gap after the demo.

What closes that gap is not a better model. It is integration into the systems you already run, evals you set the thresholds on, and a handover that leaves the thing in your repository.

SOC 2 Type II · HIPAA · Runs in your VPC

Five steps. One working system. Yours.

The same sequence every time, whether it’s one workflow or a programme. Each step ends in something you can inspect, not a status update.

  1. STEP 01 OF 05

    Teardown

    We watch the work happen. Screens, exports, the spreadsheet nobody admits to.

    • Workflow priorities
    • Payback
    • Risk
    Ranked workflows Illustrative
    HIGHEST-PRIORITY WORKFLOW

    Invoice exceptions ranked first

    Workflows ranked by payback against risk
    Rank Workflow Payback Risk
    01 Invoice exceptions High Low
    02 Order changes Medium Low
    03 Refund reviews Medium Medium

    01 goes first. Compare effort, payback and risk before choosing.

    OUT Ranked workflow list

  2. STEP 02 OF 05

    Blueprint

    The chosen workflow drawn end to end: data in, decisions, approval gates, systems written to, failure paths.

    • Workflow map
    • Approval rules
    • Success criteria
    End-to-end spec Illustrative
    1. Data in Source data
    2. Decision Rules & logic
    3. Approval gate Named owner
    4. Write to ERP System of record
    Approval
    ≥ $10k · named owner
    Failure
    Route to review queue

    OUT Signed end-to-end spec

  3. STEP 03 OF 05

    Build & integrate

    Our engineers in your repo, behind your reviews. Real connections to the systems you already run.

    • Live integrations
    • Your repository
    • Safe testing
    Shadow comparison Illustrative

    5 agree 1 needs review

    Same production data. Nothing commits until you approve the comparison.

    OUT Live in a shadow lane

  4. STEP 04 OF 05

    Evals & hardening

    Failure tests, cost ceilings, latency budgets, drift alarms, rollback.

    • Quality checks
    • Cost limits
    • Rollback
    Eval scoreboard Illustrative
    Accuracy
    94% Pass
    Cost / run
    $0.11 Pass
    Latency
    3.1s Review

    Thresholds set by your team. A breach triggers an alert; rollback is documented.

    OUT Eval scoreboard in CI

  5. STEP 05 OF 05

    Handover & scale

    Runbook, training, on-call handoff, and the next two workflows queued.

    • Team training
    • Runbooks
    • Full ownership
    Runbook & on-call Illustrative
    BUILT TO BE YOURS

    Your team. Full control.

    Your repository · Your license
    • Alert catalogue
    • Recovery procedures
    • Escalation paths
    Primary
    Your on-call owner
    Backup
    Named escalation owner

    OUT Your team running it

From the first decision to full ownership. Every step has a clear output.

Then set what it may do alone

Autonomy is a setting, and you set it.

Drag the handle. Every position is a real configuration we ship, the boundary is written into the blueprint and signed before the build, and the log line underneath is what your auditor reads at that setting.

Incoming work is checked by the agent, then committed or sent to a person.

5 3
5 of 8 items commit without a person.

Act within policy

It commits the clear cases. The threshold is yours.

The agent does this alone

  • Commits anything above your confidence floor
  • Writes to the systems named in the blueprint
  • Retries and reroutes documented failures

The agent asks first

  • Anything over the value threshold you set
  • Anything below the confidence floor
  • Any counterparty or account it has not seen
Audit trail

09:14:02 invoice #48120 · matched to PO 7741 · confidence 0.94 auto-approved · policy ≤ $10k · sampled for review

Every run is logged with its inputs, its reasoning and the identity that authorised it — so an audit request is a query.

What executives ask before signing.

Two to four practitioners for the teardown sessions, a process owner who can make decisions, an engineering contact for access, and a security reviewer.

Access provisioning can be the main dependency — read-only access for discovery, write scopes before the shadow lane. We identify approval and service-account requirements in the blueprint so access does not become a surprise during the build.

We do the consulting part — the teardown, the baseline, the sequencing call — and then we build the thing. The deliverable is a running system in your repository, not a recommendation deck. The people in the teardown are the people who write the code. There is no discovery phase that bills for six weeks, and no hand-off to a delivery team you haven’t met.

If it helps: our first output is a ranked list that sometimes tells you not to buy anything yet.

Consultants who ship.

Then the teardown said so and you saved a quarter. We baseline before we build, and if the numbers don’t clear a payback bar we’ll say it out loud and point at the next workflow on the list.

We’d rather lose one engagement than ship something your team quietly abandons in month three.

You do, from the first merge. Code, prompts, pipelines, eval suites, infrastructure definitions and runbooks land in your repository under your license as we go. There is no runtime you rent from us and no component that stops working if you stop working with us.

This is your moat — not ours.

That’s the normal case. Your cloud account, your VPC, your KMS keys, your model provider, including self-hosted. SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA-capable. RBAC per action, approval gates, queryable audit trail, and a contractual commitment not to train on your data.

The blueprint contains the data-flow diagram your security team needs, and we’ll fill in your questionnaire.

typical security review turnaround

Your team operates it with us alongside them until the handover is agreed, then it’s yours. Some clients bring us back per workflow, some move to an embedded pod, some never call again — all three are fine outcomes.

What we won’t do is make continued payment a condition of the system continuing to run.

length of the supervised operation period

Have other questions?

Contact the team

Start at the teardown, not the contract.

Bring the process that keeps breaking and we will tell you, on the call, whether it is worth automating yet.

Book a call
Book a call

Request a thirty-minute session.

Tell us about your workflow. We’ll reply to arrange a time; submitting this form does not book a calendar slot.

We'll only use this to schedule your session. See our privacy policy.